Bug 1306406

Summary: About to run task 'java.util.concurrent.FutureTask' from: java.lang.Exception
Product: [oVirt] ovirt-engine Reporter: Alexander Wels <awels>
Component: BLL.InfraAssignee: Eli Mesika <emesika>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Pavel Novotny <pnovotny>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 3.6.2.6CC: bugs, emesika, gklein, mgoldboi, nicolas, oourfali, pkliczew
Target Milestone: ovirt-3.6.3Flags: rule-engine: ovirt-3.6.z+
rule-engine: exception+
mgoldboi: planning_ack+
oourfali: devel_ack+
pstehlik: testing_ack+
Target Release: 3.6.3.2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-17 07:28:53 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Infra RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Alexander Wels 2016-02-10 18:14:20 UTC
Description of problem:
I am seeing a ton of the $Summary exceptions in my log. Not sure what the exact issue is.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Start engine, let it run and the log will contain the exceptions

Actual results:
Above exception in log


Expected results:
No exceptions in the log due to whatever issue this is.

Additional info:

Comment 2 Alexander Wels 2016-02-10 18:17:09 UTC
This is what looks like the important part of the log.

2016-02-10 16:46:46,611 DEBUG [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.BatchProcedureExecutionConnectionCallback] (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-40) [] Executed batch
2016-02-10 16:46:46,614 DEBUG [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.BatchProcedureExecutionConnectionCallback] (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-40) [] Executing batch for procedure UpdateNumaNodeStatistics
2016-02-10 16:46:46,614 DEBUG [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.BatchProcedureExecutionConnectionCallback] (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-40) [] Mapped params: [v_cpu_idle, v_numa_node_id, v_usage_mem_percent, v_
cpu_sys, v_usage_cpu_percent, v_cpu_user, v_mem_free]
2016-02-10 16:46:46,614 DEBUG [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.BatchProcedureExecutionConnectionCallback] (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-40) [] Mapped params: [v_cpu_idle, v_numa_node_id, v_usage_mem_percent, v_
cpu_sys, v_usage_cpu_percent, v_cpu_user, v_mem_free]
2016-02-10 16:46:46,615 DEBUG [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.BatchProcedureExecutionConnectionCallback] (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-40) [] Executed batch
2016-02-10 16:46:46,619 DEBUG [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.threadpool.ThreadPoolUtil] (org.ovirt.thread.pool-8-thread-30) [] About to run task 'java.util.concurrent.FutureTask' from: java.lang.Exception
        at org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.threadpool.ThreadPoolUtil$InternalThreadExecutor.beforeExecute(ThreadPoolUtil.java:53) [utils.jar:]
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) [rt.jar:1.7.0_95]
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) [rt.jar:1.7.0_95]
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) [rt.jar:1.7.0_95]

2016-02-10 16:46:46,619 DEBUG [org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.threadpool.ThreadPoolUtil] (org.ovirt.thread.pool-8-thread-35) [] About to run task 'java.util.concurrent.FutureTask' from: java.lang.Exception
        at org.ovirt.engine.core.utils.threadpool.ThreadPoolUtil$InternalThreadExecutor.beforeExecute(ThreadPoolUtil.java:53) [utils.jar:]
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) [rt.jar:1.7.0_95]
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) [rt.jar:1.7.0_95]
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) [rt.jar:1.7.0_95]

Comment 4 Oved Ourfali 2016-02-13 07:49:24 UTC
Eli, can you take a look, and then pass it to the right team, if needed?

Comment 7 Gil Klein 2016-02-17 07:28:53 UTC
This bug was fixed and is slated to be in the upcoming version. As we
are focusing our testing at this phase on severe bugs, this bug was
closed without going through its verification step. If you think this
bug should be verified by QE, please set its severity to high and move
it back to ON_QA