Bug 1306434

Summary: [abrt] Thunar: thunar killed by SIGSEGV
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Marius Pfeffer <marius>
Component: ThunarAssignee: Kevin Fenzi <kevin>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 23CC: cwickert, dhiru, kevin, nonamedotc
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/bthash/7747fa196b7ffb56019bab1a88c9716bbef35240
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:ca485bb3a1dafa7f65fa5b7bfd12fc9ec1f4b8ec;
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-11 23:10:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
File: cgroup
none
File: core_backtrace
none
File: dso_list
none
File: environ
none
File: exploitable
none
File: limits
none
File: maps
none
File: mountinfo
none
File: open_fds
none
File: proc_pid_status
none
File: var_log_messages none

Description Marius Pfeffer 2016-02-10 20:59:54 UTC 
Description of problem:
drag and dropped one folder from the desktop into an open window

Version-Release number of selected component:
Thunar-1.6.10-2.fc23

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.6.4
backtrace_rating: 3
cmdline:        /usr/bin/Thunar --daemon
executable:     /usr/bin/thunar
global_pid:     3981
kernel:         4.3.5-300.fc23.x86_64
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (4 frames)
 #0 ??
 #4 exo_job_emit_valist_in_mainloop at exo-job.c:359
 #5 mainloop_proxy_func at gioscheduler.c:200
 #10 gtk_main at gtkmain.c:1268
Comment 1 Marius Pfeffer 2016-02-10 21:00:06 UTC 
Created attachment 1122911 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Marius Pfeffer 2016-02-10 21:00:08 UTC 
Created attachment 1122913 [details]
File: cgroup
Comment 3 Marius Pfeffer 2016-02-10 21:00:15 UTC 
Created attachment 1122918 [details]
File: core_backtrace
Comment 4 Marius Pfeffer 2016-02-10 21:00:17 UTC 
Created attachment 1122920 [details]
File: dso_list
Comment 5 Marius Pfeffer 2016-02-10 21:00:19 UTC 
Created attachment 1122922 [details]
File: environ
Comment 6 Marius Pfeffer 2016-02-10 21:00:21 UTC 
Created attachment 1122923 [details]
File: exploitable
Comment 7 Marius Pfeffer 2016-02-10 21:00:22 UTC 
Created attachment 1122925 [details]
File: limits
Comment 8 Marius Pfeffer 2016-02-10 21:00:26 UTC 
Created attachment 1122928 [details]
File: maps
Comment 9 Marius Pfeffer 2016-02-10 21:00:29 UTC 
Created attachment 1122931 [details]
File: mountinfo
Comment 10 Marius Pfeffer 2016-02-10 21:00:35 UTC 
Created attachment 1122933 [details]
File: open_fds
Comment 11 Marius Pfeffer 2016-02-10 21:00:37 UTC 
Created attachment 1122934 [details]
File: proc_pid_status
Comment 12 Marius Pfeffer 2016-02-10 21:00:38 UTC 
Created attachment 1122935 [details]
File: var_log_messages
Comment 13 Kevin Fenzi 2016-02-11 13:26:48 UTC 
Can you get the crash to happen again?

If you upgrade to: 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12359686

does it prevent the crash?
Comment 14 Marius Pfeffer 2016-02-11 14:07:16 UTC 
When I've reported the bug I could reproduce it yesterday.
Tried again today after one reboot with same version 1.6.10-2.fc23 but could not get it to crash(5-10 tries).

Installed version 1.6.10.4.fc24.x86_64 from rawhide, crashed at the first try.

--- Running report_uReport ---
This problem has already been reported.
https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/933223/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279227
Adding you to CC List of the existing bugzilla bug
Using Bugzilla ID '1279227'
Logging into Bugzilla at https://bugzilla.redhat.com
Logging out
Comment 15 Kevin Fenzi 2016-02-11 23:10:25 UTC 
Yeah, was wondering if this was a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279070 and it seems so. ;(

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1279070 ***