Bug 1307059
Summary: | dnf: state=latest does not install a package | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jan Chaloupka <jchaloup> |
Component: | ansible | Assignee: | Kevin Fenzi <kevin> |
Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 22 | CC: | a.badger, athmanem, kevin, kupo, maxim |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-07-19 19:24:35 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jan Chaloupka
2016-02-12 15:30:27 UTC
Relevant for 23 and rawhide too. Merged upstream. Kevin, since we have ansible-2.0 sitting in the updates-testing repo... how would we want to get this fix applied to any fedor apackage? (i'll put it into the ansible1.9 package when we get it built but that will only be for epel6/7?) So, options are: 1. Just fix in 2.0.0.x. Jan: would this be ok for you? or do you need a fix in 1.9.x? 2. Push ansible1.9 to fedora branches too, but I think thats a mess and something to avoid, since it's going to be so short lived and it would be difficult to communicate to fedora users to switch to it if they needed. 3. Unpush 2.0.0.x from testing, revert git to 1.9.4, apply fix, build and push new 1.9.4 build, get to stable, revert git to 2.0 and push new 2.0.0.x out. This is bad because we have to play with all kinds of git reverting, but also because 2.0.0.x will become unavailable for testers while fixed 1.9.x is in testing. So, not a great solution. Not seeing much else... I hope that Jan would be ok switching to a fixed 2.0. ;) Thanks guys. As long as it gets fixed in F22+, 2) is fine :). Fedora update for 2.0.* talks about backward incompatibilities with 1.9. Have you managed to fix that? The cases where 2.0.x is incompatible with 1.9.x are either bugs (and upstream is fixing them quickly in 2.0.0.x patches) or cases where the behavior in 1.9 was wrong as well but ansible wasn't able to detect it. I encourage you to go test 2.0 for your playbooks and report any incompatibilities... Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |