Bug 1307190
Summary: | RFE: add new python RPM macros to python-devel | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) <kdreyer> |
Component: | python | Assignee: | Tomas Orsava <torsava> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE - Apps <qe-baseos-apps> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.1 | CC: | awilliam, bnater, cstratak, jdennis, jschluet, npmccallum, pviktori, torsava |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-03-22 13:02:39 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1297522 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Ken Dreyer (Red Hat)
2016-02-13 00:06:43 UTC
(In reply to Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) from comment #0) > The EPEL project has already added these macros to their "rpm-macros" > package. See the /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.epel-rpm-macros in the > epel-rpm-macros-7-5.noarch package. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241655 I'm wrong - the actual package is not epel-rpm-macros, but a dependency, python-rpm-macros. See http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python-rpm-macros.git/tree/macros.python?h=epel7 for example. *** Bug 1305852 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Are there corresponding tickets for RHEL 5 and 6? (In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #4) > Are there corresponding tickets for RHEL 5 and 6? No, this is RHEL 7–only. I'm closing this RFE as a duplicate of BZ#1297522, because the solution thereof involves adding new Python RPM macros to python-devel, thus solving this request as well. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1297522 *** |