| Summary: | bfast: FTBFS in rawhide | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Fedora Release Engineering <releng> | ||||||||||
| Component: | bfast | Assignee: | Adam Huffman <bloch> | ||||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | bloch, rc040203, yselkowi | ||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2016-03-23 11:44:40 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1305208 | ||||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||
|
Description
Fedora Release Engineering
2016-02-13 21:04:15 UTC
Created attachment 1124105 [details]
build.log
Created attachment 1124106 [details]
root.log
Created attachment 1124107 [details]
state.log
Created attachment 1128409 [details]
Patch to fix the FTBFS
Trigger of this FTFBS is this package is still relying on gnu89-inlining.
As this feature change was added to GCC-5, I wonder why this wasn't caught during the gcc-5 mass-rebuilt and didn't trigger an F23FTBFS. I assume it actually triggered an F23FTBFS (f23 still ships an f22 package), but the related BZ (RHBZ#1239386) seemingly was prematurely closed.
Anyway, the patch from the attachment should fix this issue and more related issues this package has and bring it back on track.
Unless somebody objects, I will apply this patch to rawhide and f23 in near future.
verdurin's bfast-0.7.0a-14.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=736899 This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle. Changing version to '24'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase Shouldn't that be: "CFLAGS=%optflags -fgnu89-inline" %configure (In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #7) > "CFLAGS=%optflags -fgnu89-inline" > %configure Well, it should not matter. In %build, modern rpm first exports CFLAGS, which is where it later is picked up by %configure: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.e1SA4N + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd bfast-0.7.0a + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/r + export CFLAGS ... + ./configure ... ... But you are right, %optflags would have been an alternative. @verdurin: Provided you applied this patch and rebuilt this package, please assign this BZ to you and close this BZ. Why wasn't this BZ closed? Closing |