Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1307345
bfast: FTBFS in rawhide
Last modified: 2016-03-23 07:44:40 EDT
Your package bfast failed to build from source in current rawhide.
For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
Created attachment 1124105 [details]
Created attachment 1124106 [details]
Created attachment 1124107 [details]
Created attachment 1128409 [details]
Patch to fix the FTBFS
Trigger of this FTFBS is this package is still relying on gnu89-inlining.
As this feature change was added to GCC-5, I wonder why this wasn't caught during the gcc-5 mass-rebuilt and didn't trigger an F23FTBFS. I assume it actually triggered an F23FTBFS (f23 still ships an f22 package), but the related BZ (RHBZ#1239386) seemingly was prematurely closed.
Anyway, the patch from the attachment should fix this issue and more related issues this package has and bring it back on track.
Unless somebody objects, I will apply this patch to rawhide and f23 in near future.
verdurin's bfast-0.7.0a-14.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=736899
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.
More information and reason for this action is here:
Shouldn't that be:
(In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #7)
> "CFLAGS=%optflags -fgnu89-inline"
Well, it should not matter.
In %build, modern rpm first exports CFLAGS, which is where it later is picked up by %configure:
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.e1SA4N
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd bfast-0.7.0a
+ CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/r
+ export CFLAGS
+ ./configure ...
But you are right, %optflags would have been an alternative.
@verdurin: Provided you applied this patch and rebuilt this package, please assign this BZ to you and close this BZ.
Why wasn't this BZ closed? Closing