Bug 1307737

Summary: libseccomp: FTBFS in F24
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fedora Release Engineering <releng>
Component: libseccompAssignee: Paul Moore <pmoore>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 24CC: pmoore
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: libseccomp-2.3.0-0.fc24 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-29 21:43:48 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1305208    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 21:48:17 UTC
Your package libseccomp failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12832155

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild

Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 21:48:19 UTC
Created attachment 1125272 [details]
build.log

Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 21:48:21 UTC
Created attachment 1125273 [details]
root.log

Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2016-02-13 21:48:23 UTC
Created attachment 1125274 [details]
state.log

Comment 4 Paul Moore 2016-02-15 21:42:44 UTC
This is most likely due to the build system running kernel-4.3.4-300.fc23.x86_64.  There is a known problem with kernels >= 4.3.x and current releases of libseccomp due to the direct wired socket syscalls that were introduced in Linux 4.3.  We have resolved the problem upstream and are working quickly to create a new release.

 * https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/issues/21

Comment 5 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 14:52:50 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase

Comment 6 Paul Moore 2016-02-29 21:43:48 UTC
We've released a new version upstream which should resolve this problem; an updated libseccomp package is now available for F24.

 * https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/releases/tag/v2.3.0