Bug 1310527

Summary: [libreoffice] Please add Supplements tag in specfile
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Parag Nemade <pnemade>
Component: libreofficeAssignee: David Tardon <dtardon>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 24CC: caolanm, dtardon, erack, ltinkl, mstahl, sbergman
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-26 06:07:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1314406    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Add Supplements for langpacks namimg guidelines none

Description Parag Nemade 2016-02-22 06:58:06 UTC 
Created attachment 1129152 [details]
Add Supplements for langpacks namimg guidelines

Description of problem:
As per newly approved https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Langpack guidelines in https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/593#comment:18 , I would like to request to please commit the attached patch so that langpacks installation will be helpful.

I am trying to build libreoffice using this patch since last 2 days in copr but somehow current changes are not building in copr, almost 4-5 builds failed due to either some missing BR deps as seen in root.log or some other issues with last built -3 rebuild in copr.
Comment 1 David Tardon 2016-02-22 07:42:30 UTC 
The attached patch is wrong for several reasons:
1. it does not take epoch into account;
2. it unconditionally uses the libreoffice language tags instead of glibc tags
3. (not your fault, as you can't know we do this) not usable on RHEL-7, because rpm there doesn't even understand weak deps, much less rich deps

Also, I see no reason to do this for autocorr packages as well--they are pulled in by respective langpacks.

I'm running a scratch build now...
Comment 2 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 15:28:38 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase