Bug 131266

Summary:	update spec to include subpackages
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Greg Kurtzer <gmkurtzer>
Component:	lam	Assignee:	Jason Vas Dias <jvdias>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-06-03 14:43:54 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Greg Kurtzer 2004-08-30 16:57:20 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030422

Description of problem:
<gmkurtzer>
http://mirror.caosity.org/cAos-2/ext/autobuilder/i386/00_LOGS/gmk/lam/SPECS/lam.spec
<lon> wow, that's a pretty spec file
<gmkurtzer> hehe... your too kind. ;)
<gmkurtzer> actually, that is jeff's stuff.
<lon> still, you should pull down the lam source rpm from red hat and
look at the spec file ;)
<gmkurtzer> I did it at one point, but not recently. I will do so.
<gmkurtzer> FC2, or RHEL SRPM?
<lon> i'd look @ fc2
<lon> probably more recent
<lon> it's ugly.
<lon> but works.
<gmkurtzer> hehe...
<gmkurtzer> ahh, the reason that we didn't use that rpm is because it
doesnt create any subpackges
<gmkurtzer> and our node file system is about 30MB
<gmkurtzer> that would bump it to 35
<lon> ah
<lon> nod
<lon> You can file a bugzilla against it - toss in that spec link you
sent me.  :)  I can look @ it for FC4

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Uhmm... build the RPM
2. These fields are rather not needed for an RFE!
3.
    

Additional info:

Comment 1 Lon Hohberger 2004-08-30 16:59:02 UTC

Thanks for the post.

Comment 2 Jason Vas Dias 2005-06-03 14:43:54 UTC

Presumably whatever changes were required to the spec file have been
made - link above is no longer there. If there's any issues with the
current  2.0.2-3 release, please open another bug.