Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 131266 - update spec to include subpackages
update spec to include subpackages
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: lam (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jason Vas Dias
Brian Brock
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2004-08-30 12:57 EDT by Greg Kurtzer
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-06-03 10:43:54 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Greg Kurtzer 2004-08-30 12:57:20 EDT 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030422

Description of problem:
<gmkurtzer>
http://mirror.caosity.org/cAos-2/ext/autobuilder/i386/00_LOGS/gmk/lam/SPECS/lam.spec
<lon> wow, that's a pretty spec file
<gmkurtzer> hehe... your too kind. ;)
<gmkurtzer> actually, that is jeff's stuff.
<lon> still, you should pull down the lam source rpm from red hat and
look at the spec file ;)
<gmkurtzer> I did it at one point, but not recently. I will do so.
<gmkurtzer> FC2, or RHEL SRPM?
<lon> i'd look @ fc2
<lon> probably more recent
<lon> it's ugly.
<lon> but works.
<gmkurtzer> hehe...
<gmkurtzer> ahh, the reason that we didn't use that rpm is because it
doesnt create any subpackges
<gmkurtzer> and our node file system is about 30MB
<gmkurtzer> that would bump it to 35
<lon> ah
<lon> nod
<lon> You can file a bugzilla against it - toss in that spec link you
sent me.  :)  I can look @ it for FC4

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Uhmm... build the RPM
2. These fields are rather not needed for an RFE!
3.
    

Additional info:
Comment 1 Lon Hohberger 2004-08-30 12:59:02 EDT 
Thanks for the post.
Comment 2 Jason Vas Dias 2005-06-03 10:43:54 EDT 
Presumably whatever changes were required to the spec file have been
made - link above is no longer there. If there's any issues with the
current  2.0.2-3 release, please open another bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.