From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030422 Description of problem: <gmkurtzer> http://mirror.caosity.org/cAos-2/ext/autobuilder/i386/00_LOGS/gmk/lam/SPECS/lam.spec <lon> wow, that's a pretty spec file <gmkurtzer> hehe... your too kind. ;) <gmkurtzer> actually, that is jeff's stuff. <lon> still, you should pull down the lam source rpm from red hat and look at the spec file ;) <gmkurtzer> I did it at one point, but not recently. I will do so. <gmkurtzer> FC2, or RHEL SRPM? <lon> i'd look @ fc2 <lon> probably more recent <lon> it's ugly. <lon> but works. <gmkurtzer> hehe... <gmkurtzer> ahh, the reason that we didn't use that rpm is because it doesnt create any subpackges <gmkurtzer> and our node file system is about 30MB <gmkurtzer> that would bump it to 35 <lon> ah <lon> nod <lon> You can file a bugzilla against it - toss in that spec link you sent me. :) I can look @ it for FC4 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Uhmm... build the RPM 2. These fields are rather not needed for an RFE! 3. Additional info:
Thanks for the post.
Presumably whatever changes were required to the spec file have been made - link above is no longer there. If there's any issues with the current 2.0.2-3 release, please open another bug.