Bug 1315903
| Summary: | Fedora - docker do not build for ppc64 so change ExclusiveArch as bypass | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michel Normand <normand> |
| Component: | docker | Assignee: | Daniel Walsh <dwalsh> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 27 | CC: | adimania, admiller, amurdaca, bpradipt, bugproxy, dan, dwalsh, hannsj_uhl, herrold, ichavero, jcajka, jchaloup, jomiller, lsm5, marianne, miminar, opensource, vbatts |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | ppc64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 1:1.10.2-12.gitddbb15a | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-11-27 16:59:48 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1071880, 1051573, 1182617, 1465171, 1465174, 1465176 | ||
Did you(or somebody) investigated why it fails? Is there upstream report? (In reply to Jakub Čajka from comment #1) > Did you(or somebody) investigated why it fails? > Is there upstream report? No I did not investigated myself the details of the failure but the work done by IBM for RH 7.3 feature https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182617 was only on ppc64le, not ppc64. Docker upstream support for Power is only for LE (ppc64le). Big endian support is not available. [1] - https://master.dockerproject.org/ [2] - https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/99433d2ca217bd9479169c93a20b6f6530f94856/README.md#architectures-other-than-amd64 [3] -https://github.com/docker/docker/commit/91201678c6f58a5e46fe302bed9eb55a7ddcf693 Hello Lokesh, Would it be possible to make quickly the change in spec file ? This is a blocker to build ppc64le on secondary architecture. (In reply to Michel Normand from comment #0) > My proposed spec change is to > === replace: > ExclusiveArch: %{go_arches} > === by: > ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 %{arm} aarch64 ppc64le s390x %{mips} > === > I'll add this change for now, let's keep this bug open though. building here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13297206 See: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/docker.git/commit/?h=f24&id=a40eb0a54eb54a4082efb4f0fc25e62c0490580e Pushed for rawhide and f24 branches. This bug was accidentally moved from POST to MODIFIED via an error in automation, please see mmccune with any questions This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 25 development cycle. Changing version to '25'. (In reply to Jan Kurik from comment #10) > This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora > 25 development cycle. > Changing version to '25'. I reset the version to Rawhide. Since it block the PPCtracker it is supposed to stay open until docker builds on ppc64 afaiu. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 27 development cycle. Changing version to '27'. This message is a reminder that Fedora 27 is nearing its end of life. On 2018-Nov-30 Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 27. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '27'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 27 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. ppc64 (BE) not supported anymore for Fedora since F29, so close the bug. |
docker do not build for ppc64 as reported by scratch build extract (1) Because this build failure of ppc64 is blocking the build of ppc64le on secondary koji, I am requesting with this bug to remove ppc64 as target archi in docker.spec as a bypass at least for fc24 or later. My proposed spec change is to === replace: ExclusiveArch: %{go_arches} === by: ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 %{arm} aarch64 ppc64le s390x %{mips} === This is based on go_arches macro from (2) (1) http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3192877 === +++ go build -o bundles/1.10.2/dynbinary/dockerinit-1.10.2 -a -tags 'autogen netgo static_build sqlite_omit_load_extension selinux seccomp daemon journald' -installsuffix netgo -ldflags ' -w -extldflags "-static" ' ./dockerinit _build/src/github.com/docker/docker/daemon/execdriver/native/exec.go:17:2: no buildable Go source files in /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0f5ac89062e1f80bd87e7db9a94859adf7a188a7/vendor/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/nsenter _build/src/github.com/docker/docker/daemon/execdriver/native/seccomp_default.go:9:2: no buildable Go source files in /builddir/build/BUILD/docker-0f5ac89062e1f80bd87e7db9a94859adf7a188a7/vendor/src/github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.b18XcW (%build) === (2) http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/go-srpm-macros.git/commit/?id=1d07f0352ebde464347c6dc92532a9d1156c34f3 === %golang_arches %{ix86} x86_64 %{arm} aarch64 %{power64} %gccgo_arches s390x %{mips} %go_arches %{golang_arches} %{gccgo_arches} ===