Bug 1316552
| Summary: | License tag does not match actual license of code | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Marcel Kolaja <mkolaja> |
| Component: | 389-ds-base | Assignee: | Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Viktor Ashirov <vashirov> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 7.2 | CC: | ekeck, iweller, mkolaja, nhosoi, nkinder, rmeggins, sramling |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 389-ds-base-1.3.4.0-29.el7_2 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
The LICENSE file contains the correct license information, which is GPLv3+. Previously, the output of the "rpm -qi 389-ds-base" command displayed an incorrect License field with an earlier license, GPLv2 with exceptions. The License field in RPM now contains the correct information.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 1315893 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2016-03-31 22:05:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1315893 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Marcel Kolaja
2016-03-10 13:09:18 UTC
Thanks Noriko! for adding bug verification steps. Upgraded 389-ds-base packages on RHEL7.2 machine and run rpm command to check the version number of License. It shows GPLv3+. Hence, marking the bug as Verified. [root@vm-idm-004 ~]# rpm -qi 389-ds-base | egrep "Name|Version|Release|License" Name : 389-ds-base Version : 1.3.4.0 Release : 29.el7_2 License : GPLv3+ Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0550.html |