Bug 1319800

Summary:	[RFE] Add concept of "system locking"
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Bryan Kearney <bkearney>
Component:	Configuration Management	Assignee:	satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.1.1	CC:	jentrena, nsamant, oprazak
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-09-04 19:07:04 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Bryan Kearney 2016-03-21 14:44:35 UTC

Hosts which are managed by satellite may wish to be "locked" so that no changes are accidently made. This lock should ensure that:

1) No new content is consumed by the host
2) No configuration changes are made to the host
3) No remote execution commands are sent to the host 

This was a feature of satellite 5 which can be read about at https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Network/5.0.0/html/Reference_Guide/s3-sm-system-details.html.

There are some old bugs aroudn locking which should be included when implementing this RFE:

-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591284
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248475
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876590
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844926

Comment 1 Ondřej Pražák 2017-04-21 10:57:28 UTC

Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/19343 from this bug

Comment 2 Satellite Program 2017-05-31 20:09:33 UTC

Connecting redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/10799 from this bug

Comment 3 Neha Samant 2018-01-31 05:38:03 UTC

Hello,
could we have any update on this please so that the same can be conveyed to the Customer.

Thanks,
Neha

Comment 4 Ondřej Pražák 2018-01-31 09:01:54 UTC

Hi,
there has been no progress on this because of work on items with higher priority.

Comment 5 Bryan Kearney 2018-09-04 18:56:31 UTC

Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you.

Comment 6 Bryan Kearney 2018-09-04 19:07:04 UTC

Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you.