Bug 1323702 (CVE-2015-6360)

Summary: CVE-2015-6360 libsrtp: improper handling of CSRC count and extension header length in RTP header
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: Andrej Nemec <anemec>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: unspecifiedCC: jgrulich, tcallawa, trevor.hemsley
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened, Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-27 09:46:44 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1323703, 1323704, 1323705    
Bug Blocks: 1323706    

Description Andrej Nemec 2016-04-04 13:11:59 UTC
Randell Jesup and the Firefox team discovered that srtp, Cisco's
reference implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol
(SRTP), does not properly handle RTP header CSRC count and extension
header length. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to crash
an application linked against libsrtp, resulting in a denial of service.

References:

http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/11

Comment 1 Andrej Nemec 2016-04-04 13:12:30 UTC
Created libsrtp tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1323703]
Affects: epel-6 [bug 1323704]
Affects: epel-7 [bug 1323705]

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2016-05-03 16:35:45 UTC
asterisk-1.8.32.3-2.el6, libsrtp-1.5.4-3.el6, pjproject-2.3-7.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 4 Trevor Hemsley 2016-05-24 16:28:59 UTC
Was it necessary to bump the libsrtp.so name to libsrtp.so.1 in this update?

Comment 5 Tom "spot" Callaway 2016-07-06 17:46:08 UTC
That's the soname for the 1.5 series from upstream, so yes.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2020-09-29 19:27:16 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7

Via RHSA-2020:3873 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:3873