Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 1323702 - (CVE-2015-6360) CVE-2015-6360 libsrtp: improper handling of CSRC count and extension header length in RTP header
CVE-2015-6360 libsrtp: improper handling of CSRC count and extension header l...
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability (Show other bugs)
unspecified
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Red Hat Product Security
impact=moderate,public=20160402,repor...
: Reopened, Security
Depends On: 1323705 1323703 1323704
Blocks: 1323706
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-04-04 09:11 EDT by Andrej Nemec
Modified: 2016-10-27 05:46 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-27 05:46:44 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Andrej Nemec 2016-04-04 09:11:59 EDT
Randell Jesup and the Firefox team discovered that srtp, Cisco's
reference implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol
(SRTP), does not properly handle RTP header CSRC count and extension
header length. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to crash
an application linked against libsrtp, resulting in a denial of service.

References:

http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2016/Apr/11
Comment 1 Andrej Nemec 2016-04-04 09:12:30 EDT
Created libsrtp tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1323703]
Affects: epel-6 [bug 1323704]
Affects: epel-7 [bug 1323705]
Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2016-05-03 12:35:45 EDT
asterisk-1.8.32.3-2.el6, libsrtp-1.5.4-3.el6, pjproject-2.3-7.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 4 Trevor Hemsley 2016-05-24 12:28:59 EDT
Was it necessary to bump the libsrtp.so name to libsrtp.so.1 in this update?
Comment 5 Tom "spot" Callaway 2016-07-06 13:46:08 EDT
That's the soname for the 1.5 series from upstream, so yes.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.