Bug 1324270

Summary: Review Request: python-spur - Run commands locally or over SSH using the same interface
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Orion Poplawski <orion>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: William Moreno <williamjmorenor>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review, williamjmorenor
Target Milestone: ---Flags: williamjmorenor: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-04-25 16:04:55 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1324667    

Description Orion Poplawski 2016-04-06 03:05:41 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python-spur.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python-spur-0.3.15-1.fc25.src.rpm
Description: 
Run commands and manipulate files locally or over SSH using the same interface.

Fedora Account System Username: orion

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13569928

Comment 1 William Moreno 2016-04-19 19:22:20 UTC
Packaged Aproved
================

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python2-spur-0.3.15-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
          python3-spur-0.3.15-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
          python-spur-0.3.15-1.fc23.src.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Requires
--------
python3-spur (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python3-paramiko

python2-spur (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python-paramiko

Provides
--------
python3-spur:
    python3-spur

python2-spur:
    python-spur
    python2-spur

Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/mwilliamson/spur.py/archive/0.3.15.tar.gz#/spur-0.3.15.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 0eae5baa2f21b5dfe582a69782e4edc9270489aef0648b82d20b622671644588
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 0eae5baa2f21b5dfe582a69782e4edc9270489aef0648b82d20b622671644588

Comment 2 Orion Poplawski 2016-04-19 19:36:49 UTC
Thanks for the review!

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2016-04-23 16:26:03 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-spur

Comment 4 Orion Poplawski 2016-04-25 16:04:55 UTC
Checked in and built.