Bug 1327035
Summary: | fuse: Avoid redundant lookup on "." and ".." as part of every readdirp | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu> |
Component: | fuse | Assignee: | Bug Updates Notification Mailing List <rhs-bugs> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Nag Pavan Chilakam <nchilaka> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rhgs-3.1 | CC: | asrivast, bugs, chrisw, csaba, nlevinki, rcyriac, rgowdapp, rhinduja, sankarshan, spalai |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | ZStream |
Target Release: | RHGS 3.1.3 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.7.9-2 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1273315 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2016-06-23 05:17:27 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1273315 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1311817 |
Description
Pranith Kumar K
2016-04-14 07:02:26 UTC
Discussed with Dev. and found that there is no clear way of validating this bug as this is a code change with no direct functional impact. Hence moving it to verified However, following was what i did test: tried to check the lookups using profiling and didn't find difference b/w fuse client versions of 3.7.9-1(before fix) and 3.7.9-3(after fix) (the server versions for both were common 3.7.9-3) However dev. mentioned that this may not be right test Did a lot of IO and checked statedump before clearing client cache and after clearing client cache( searched for IO the hot-count in inode table ) didnt see much difference b/w the different client version Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1240 |