Bug 132736

Summary: Patch to accomodate rhgb starting X on :1
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Daniel Veillard <veillard>
Component: firstbootAssignee: Adrian Likins <alikins>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: alexl
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-09-27 13:21:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch for rhgb-0.13.2 none

Description Daniel Veillard 2004-09-16 15:11:55 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7)
Gecko/20040805 Firefox/0.9.2

Description of problem:
starting with rhgb-0.13.2 rhgb will not start X on :0
anymore, but it will store the DISPLAY used on a file.
The patch enclosed grab that file and set the DISPLAY
accordingly if found. The patch  should not break with
older versions of rhgb, it should be safe to apply.
On the other hand without the patch initscript won't succeed
with more recent versions of rhgb, so pushing an update with
it soon would make sense,

Daniel

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
firstboot-1.3.25-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. start firstboot without the patch if rhgb-0.13.2
2. firstboot does not start
3.
    

Additional info:

Comment 1 Daniel Veillard 2004-09-16 15:12:53 UTC
Created attachment 103911 [details]
patch for rhgb-0.13.2

Comment 2 Adrian Likins 2004-09-21 16:45:38 UTC
patch applied in cvs, should land in 1.3.26

Comment 3 Daniel Veillard 2004-09-21 17:01:06 UTC
thanks !
Beware  rhgb-0.13.2 is in the current distributed rawhide, you
may start getting bugs about this,

Daniel

Comment 4 Daniel Veillard 2004-09-24 08:31:43 UTC
*** Bug 133351 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Daniel Veillard 2004-09-27 13:21:17 UTC
Okay got it from rawhide,

  thanks,

Daniel