Bug 1333899

Summary: recommended packages do not get installed in a default Workstation install, so fonts like Carlito/Caladea are missing
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michael Stahl <mstahl>
Component: libreofficeAssignee: David Tardon <dtardon>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 24CC: caolanm, dtardon, erack, mstahl, sbergman, vondruch
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: libreoffice-5.1.3.2-5.fc24 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-05-17 15:11:36 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Michael Stahl 2016-05-06 15:25:20 UTC
Description of problem:

Installed Fedora Workstation 24 beta-1-4 ISO, got LibreOffice installed but no Carlito/Caladea fonts

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libreoffice-core-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. installed Fedora Workstation 24 beta-1-4,
2. rpm -qa | grep crosextra

Actual results:

no fonts

Expected results:

fonts

Additional info:

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libreoffice.git/commit/?h=f24&id=43fec3aae003006c3acdb8c34fdb48dd79a02768

this commit switched from "Requires" to "Recommends" for the fonts,
but according to rdieter the "Recommends" are ignored by the
tools that build the workstation images.

so either back to "Requires", or manually add the pacakges to
@libreoffice group in comps as a workaroun

Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2016-05-06 19:50:38 UTC
I reckon back to Requires over faffing around with comps

Comment 2 Michael Stahl 2016-05-09 13:58:03 UTC
just noticed there's a similar problem with "Supplements:"

i have only the "gen" vclplug installed despite running GNOME :(

> rpm -qa | grep libreoffice

libreoffice-impress-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-ure-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-pyuno-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-pdfimport-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-data-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.noarch
libreoffice-x11-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreofficekit-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-writer-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-opensymbol-fonts-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.noarch
libreoffice-math-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-draw-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-core-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-graphicfilter-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-filters-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-emailmerge-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-calc-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2016-05-16 06:13:26 UTC
libreoffice-5.1.3.2-5.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6583a130dc

Comment 4 Vít Ondruch 2016-05-16 14:31:49 UTC
Why not fix the comps instead of reverting the soft dependencies?

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2016-05-16 23:56:30 UTC
libreoffice-5.1.3.2-5.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6583a130dc

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2016-05-17 15:11:30 UTC
libreoffice-5.1.3.2-5.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.