Bug 1333899 - recommended packages do not get installed in a default Workstation install, so fonts like Carlito/Caladea are missing
Summary: recommended packages do not get installed in a default Workstation install, s...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: libreoffice
Version: 24
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Tardon
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-05-06 15:25 UTC by Michael Stahl
Modified: 2016-06-08 07:57 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: libreoffice-5.1.3.2-5.fc24
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-05-17 15:11:36 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1343756 0 unspecified CLOSED Unable to remove -gtk3 subpackage while -gtk2 is still provided 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1343756

Description Michael Stahl 2016-05-06 15:25:20 UTC
Description of problem:

Installed Fedora Workstation 24 beta-1-4 ISO, got LibreOffice installed but no Carlito/Caladea fonts

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libreoffice-core-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. installed Fedora Workstation 24 beta-1-4,
2. rpm -qa | grep crosextra

Actual results:

no fonts

Expected results:

fonts

Additional info:

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libreoffice.git/commit/?h=f24&id=43fec3aae003006c3acdb8c34fdb48dd79a02768

this commit switched from "Requires" to "Recommends" for the fonts,
but according to rdieter the "Recommends" are ignored by the
tools that build the workstation images.

so either back to "Requires", or manually add the pacakges to
@libreoffice group in comps as a workaroun

Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2016-05-06 19:50:38 UTC
I reckon back to Requires over faffing around with comps

Comment 2 Michael Stahl 2016-05-09 13:58:03 UTC
just noticed there's a similar problem with "Supplements:"

i have only the "gen" vclplug installed despite running GNOME :(

> rpm -qa | grep libreoffice

libreoffice-impress-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-ure-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-pyuno-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-pdfimport-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-data-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.noarch
libreoffice-x11-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreofficekit-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-writer-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-opensymbol-fonts-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.noarch
libreoffice-math-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-draw-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-core-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-graphicfilter-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-filters-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-emailmerge-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64
libreoffice-calc-5.1.3.1-1.fc24.x86_64

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2016-05-16 06:13:26 UTC
libreoffice-5.1.3.2-5.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6583a130dc

Comment 4 Vít Ondruch 2016-05-16 14:31:49 UTC
Why not fix the comps instead of reverting the soft dependencies?

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2016-05-16 23:56:30 UTC
libreoffice-5.1.3.2-5.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6583a130dc

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2016-05-17 15:11:30 UTC
libreoffice-5.1.3.2-5.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.