Bug 1335029

Summary: set errno in case of inode_link failures
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Soumya Koduri <skoduri>
Component: libgfapiAssignee: Soumya Koduri <skoduri>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Arthy Loganathan <aloganat>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rhgs-3.1CC: amukherj, bugs, olim, rcyriac, rhinduja, rhs-bugs, sdharane
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: RHGS 3.2.0   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.8.4-1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1334621 Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-23 05:30:40 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1334621, 1334854    
Bug Blocks: 1333546, 1351515    

Description Soumya Koduri 2016-05-11 07:52:03 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1334621 +++

Description of problem:

Currently gfapi does not seem to be setting errno appropriately in case of inode_link failures. This may cause mislead applications (for eg., nfs-ganesha) which rely on errno to determine the error encountered. 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2016-05-10 03:44:07 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14278 (gfapi: set errno for inode_link failures) posted (#1) for review on master by soumya k (skoduri)

--- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2016-05-10 06:08:26 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14278 (libglusterfs/gfapi: set appropriate errno for inode_link failures) posted (#2) for review on master by soumya k (skoduri)

--- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2016-05-10 07:42:01 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14278 (libglusterfs/gfapi: set appropriate errno for inode_link failures) posted (#3) for review on master by soumya k (skoduri)

--- Additional comment from Vijay Bellur on 2016-05-10 12:10:28 EDT ---

COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/14278 committed in master by Niels de Vos (ndevos) 
------
commit 176724cdec7061ead0bd7497bb56d0ac09a668a7
Author: Soumya Koduri <skoduri>
Date:   Tue May 10 13:03:42 2016 +0530

    libglusterfs/gfapi: set appropriate errno for inode_link failures
    
    We do not seem to be setting errno appropriately in case
    of inode_link failures. This errno may be used by any application
    (for eg., nfs-ganesha) to determine the error encountered. This
    patch addresses the same.
    
    Change-Id: I674f747c73369d0597a9c463e6ea4c85b9091355
    BUG: 1334621
    Signed-off-by: Soumya Koduri <skoduri>
    Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/14278
    Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com>
    Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos>
    NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org>
    Reviewed-by: jiffin tony Thottan <jthottan>
    Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle>
    CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com>

Comment 2 Soumya Koduri 2016-05-11 07:54:52 UTC
The issue was uncovered with bug1333546. The fixes are posted/merged upstream -
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14278
https://review.gerrithub.io/275930

Comment 4 Atin Mukherjee 2016-09-17 12:03:09 UTC
Upstream mainline : http://review.gluster.org/14278
Upstream 3.8 : http://review.gluster.org/14288

And the fix is available in rhgs-3.2.0 as part of rebase to GlusterFS 3.8.4.

Comment 7 Arthy Loganathan 2016-12-29 05:36:43 UTC
Verified the fix in build,

nfs-ganesha-gluster-2.4.1-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-ganesha-3.8.4-10.el7rhgs.x86_64
nfs-ganesha-2.4.1-3.el7rhgs.x86_64

Basic IO's are running fine and no crashes are observed.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2017-03-23 05:30:40 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0486.html