Bug 1340059
| Summary: | Cannot install KDE after a GNOME install due to unprovided packages in base-x | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ed Greshko <ed.greshko> |
| Component: | comps | Assignee: | Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 23 | CC: | kevin, rdieter, vpavlin |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-05-26 12:07:40 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ed Greshko
2016-05-26 11:41:17 UTC
Affects F24 as well. It's possible part of this could be a dnf bug too. That said, comps probably shouldn't include references to non-existent packages either. I'll work on a pull request for that. Missing items on my f24/x86_64 box, and mentioning pkg (Exclude/Exlusive)|Arch tags:
xorg-x11-drv-armsoc : ExclusiveArch: %{arm} aarch64
xorg-x11-drv-freedreno : ExclusiveArch: %{arm} aarch64
xorg-x11-drv-mga : dead.package
xorg-x11-drv-modesetting : dead.package (Obsoletes/Provides: xorg-x11-server-Xorg)
xorg-x11-drv-omap : ExclusiveArch: %{arm}
So, we can definitely remove the items that no longer exist, but not sure how arch-specific packages are supposed to be handled:
* does comps have any way to mark something arch-specific?
* should dnf handle this more gracefully (and be non-fatal)?
ah, appears already reported and tracked @ bug #1339742 , marking as dup *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1339742 *** |