Bug 1344758
Summary: | [GSS] Removal of bricks in volume isn't prevented if remaining brick doesn't contain all the files | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Cal Calhoun <ccalhoun> | |
Component: | glusterd | Assignee: | Sanju <srakonde> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Sayalee <saraut> | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | high | |||
Version: | rhgs-3.1 | CC: | akrishna, amukherj, bkunal, ccalhoun, nchilaka, phil.coleman, pprakash, rhinduja, rhs-bugs, saraut, sheggodu, srakonde, storage-qa-internal, vbellur | |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | ZStream | |
Target Release: | RHGS 3.5.z Batch Update 1 | |||
Hardware: | x86_64 | |||
OS: | Linux | |||
Whiteboard: | dht-gss, dht-gss-ask, dht-3.2.0-proposed | |||
Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-6.0-23 | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: |
With this update removal of bricks will be aborted with a proper warning message if re-balance process has failed or there are some skipped files. However, users can still remove the brick by using 'force' option.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1514683 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-01-30 06:42:47 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | 1514683 | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1369781, 1408949, 1468976, 1472361, 1481177 |
Description
Cal Calhoun
2016-06-10 16:12:31 UTC
remove brick commit functionality does have some cases where there could be data losses and that's why the CLI output throws up an warning message. I am moving this bug to zteam (DHT) for further comments. REVISION POSTED: https://review.gluster.org/18801 (cli: WIP) posted (#2) for review on master by N Balachandran have updated the doc text kindly verify the doc text- field. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0288 |