Bug 1346049

Summary: orocos-bfl FTBFS on aarch64 epel7
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: D. Marlin <dmarlin>
Component: orocos-bflAssignee: Till Hofmann <thofmann>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel7CC: thofmann
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: aarch64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-06-30 09:56:44 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1285484    
Attachments:
Description Flags
SRPM with correct ExcludeArch none

Description D. Marlin 2016-06-13 19:07:59 UTC
Description of problem:

orocos-bfl fails to build from source for Fedora EPEL7 on RHELSA-7.2.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

orocos-bfl-0.8.99-5.20160503gitc1b18e3.el7


How reproducible:

consistently


Steps to Reproduce:
1.  On a RHELSA-7.2 host:
     mock -r epel-7-aarch64 orocos-bfl-0.8.99-5.20160503gitc1b18e3.el7.src.rpm
2.
3.

Actual results:

test 5
    Start 5: test_model

5: Test command: /builddir/build/BUILD/orocos-bayesian-filtering.git/orocos_bfl/tests/test_model
5: Test timeout computed to be: 9.99988e+06
5: .F..
5: 
5: model_test.cpp:99:Assertion
5: Test name: ModelTest::testDiscreteSystemModel
5: equality assertion failed
5: - Expected: 0.98
5: - Actual  : 0.005
5: 
5: Failures !!!
5: Run: 3   Failure total: 1   Failures: 1   Errors: 0
5/8 Test #5: test_model .......................***Failed    0.01 sec


Expected results:

build completes without test failures.


Additional info:

Comment 1 Till Hofmann 2016-06-13 20:18:46 UTC
The exact same error occurs on arm, which is why this package is not built for arm, as noted in the Spec file.

I reported the issue upstream: http://bugs.orocos.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062
I do not expect upstream to fix this anytime soon.

Should I add ExcludeArch: aarch64 ?

Comment 2 D. Marlin 2016-06-14 23:45:25 UTC
(In reply to Till Hofmann from comment #1)
> The exact same error occurs on arm, which is why this package is not built
> for arm, as noted in the Spec file.
> 
> I reported the issue upstream: http://bugs.orocos.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1062
> I do not expect upstream to fix this anytime soon.
> 
> Should I add ExcludeArch: aarch64 ?

Yes, please.  We can revisit this when there is an upstream fix.

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2016-06-15 07:20:14 UTC
orocos-bfl-0.8.99-6.20160503gitc1b18e3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-45a9108df2

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2016-06-16 15:18:49 UTC
orocos-bfl-0.8.99-6.20160503gitc1b18e3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-45a9108df2

Comment 5 D. Marlin 2016-06-29 15:26:41 UTC
Using orocos-bfl-0.8.99-6.20160503gitc1b18e3.el7.src.rpm, I am still seeing the same test failure on AArch64.

Comment 6 Till Hofmann 2016-06-29 17:46:41 UTC
Created attachment 1174132 [details]
SRPM with correct ExcludeArch

Comment 7 Till Hofmann 2016-06-29 17:47:36 UTC
There was a typo in the Spec file, there is no %{aarch64} macro, I replaced it with 'ExcludeArch: aarch64'. Can you please try the attached SRPM?

Comment 8 D. Marlin 2016-06-29 22:27:39 UTC
I downloaded the attached SRPM and tried another build:

   Start: rpmbuild orocos-bfl-0.8.99-6.20160503gitc1b18e3.el7.src.rpm
   error: Architecture is excluded: aarch64

It works as expected.

Comment 9 Till Hofmann 2016-06-30 09:56:44 UTC
Thank you for the feedback, I pushed the change. I think a rebuild was actually unnecessary because there are no changes for any other arch. I unpushed the old update and I won't push a new update, but any new build will skip aarch64 from now on.

Closing as WONTFIX because simply skipping aarch64 doesn't really fix the issue.