Bug 134610
Summary: | gconf schema's missing? | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Bryan W Clark <nobody+bclark> | ||||
Component: | gnumeric | Assignee: | Caolan McNamara <caolanm> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 3 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2004-10-05 16:17:18 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 131589 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Bryan W Clark
2004-10-04 22:36:19 UTC
Created attachment 104757 [details]
Gnumeric Screenshot with 'schema missing'
I have gnumeric 1.2.13-6 and GConf2-2.8.0.1-1 and don't see this problem :-( the schemas of /etc/gconf/schemas/gnumeric-dialogs.schemas etc exist, do other applications like gedit,evolution,gcalctool work ok ? Is there any permissions difference between the gnumeric*schemas and the rest of them ? Weird, same versions. [clarkbw@rhbw ~]$ rpm -qv gnumeric gnumeric-1.2.13-6 [clarkbw@rhbw ~]$ rpm -qv GConf2 GConf2-2.8.0.1-1 The schema does exist and the permissions seem to be the same as others. [clarkbw@rhbw ~]$ ll /etc/gconf/schemas/gnumeric-dialogs.schemas -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 114787 Sep 30 17:09 /etc/gconf/schemas/gnumeric-dialogs.schemas [clarkbw@rhbw ~]$ ll /etc/gconf/schemas/gedit.schemas -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 635405 Sep 22 14:02 /etc/gconf/schemas/gedit.schemas rats! try rpm --erase gnumeric and yum install gnumeric. Perhaps there was some foo on a previous update. hm, seems to have fixed itself. Thanks Caolan! hmm, well we'll close it and hopefully there isn't some nasty underlying gnumeric foo |