Bug 134959

Summary: FC3T2 openoffice file dialogs very broken on x86-64
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Alan Cox <alan>
Component: gtk2Assignee: Matthias Clasen <mclasen>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3CC: wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-10-15 20:28:10 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 135709    
Bug Blocks: 131589    
Attachments:
Description Flags
rpm -qa
none
rpm -ql gtk2 for the i386 package
none
rpm -ql gtk2 for the x86_64 package
none
/etc/gtk-2.0/i386-redhat-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf.loaders
none
/etc/gtk-2.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf.loaders none

Description Alan Cox 2004-10-07 15:07:34 UTC 
There is no dependancies to suck in the Red Hat i386 theme. 

If you then add these you get

Error loading XPM image loader: UNable to load image-loading module:
/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory

mixed with a collection of 

Glib and Gtk CRITICAL error spewage about G_IS_OBJECT(object) failed
and pixbuf != NULL. 

Many icons on the buttons are missing

Also other stuff like CD-ROM and Floppy are missing from the selector.

If you hit CTRL-L you then discover ftp:// access is broken (but does
work in gnome applications).

Very very messy.
Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2004-10-13 17:54:59 UTC 
If it cannot load pixbuf loaders, it is no wonder that the icons are
missing.

Do you have /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/*.so, and are they
64bit shared objects ?

Do you have /etc/gtk-2.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf.loaders,
and does it look ok ?
Comment 2 Alan Cox 2004-10-13 22:33:57 UTC 
I do and they work fine, but remember openoffice is a 32bit app so
should be using the 32bit loaders..
Comment 3 Dan Williams 2004-10-14 15:48:39 UTC 
So the question is, why is 32-bit GTK looking for the loaders in the
64-bit directories?
Comment 4 Dan Williams 2004-10-14 15:56:10 UTC 
Alan, do you have 32-bit redhat-artwork at all?
Comment 5 Alexander Larsson 2004-10-14 16:09:21 UTC 
Depending on bug 135709 to get 32bit redhat-artwork installed.
Comment 6 Matthias Clasen 2004-10-14 17:21:14 UTC 
The file dialog in ooo to work fine on a fresh x86_64 install of
rawhide 20041013. 

Is your system a fresh install, or has it been updated from older test
releases, Alan ? The had some issues, initially, so maybe this is a
"rolling update" symptom... 
Do you have  /etc/gtk-2.0/i386-redhat-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf.loaders,
and does it list .so files in /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders ?
Are those present, and are 32-bit ?
Comment 7 Alan Cox 2004-10-14 17:30:39 UTC 
I didnt originally have the 32bit ones installed but found that
updating them made no diferences. WHat else should be present( eg can
you email me an rpm -qa from a working case and I'll verify what the
problem item is)
Comment 8 Matthias Clasen 2004-10-14 19:07:18 UTC 
Created attachment 105222 [details]
rpm -qa
Comment 9 Matthias Clasen 2004-10-14 19:08:12 UTC 
Created attachment 105223 [details]
rpm -ql gtk2 for the i386 package
Comment 10 Matthias Clasen 2004-10-14 19:08:40 UTC 
Created attachment 105224 [details]
rpm -ql gtk2 for the x86_64 package
Comment 11 Matthias Clasen 2004-10-14 19:10:14 UTC 
Created attachment 105225 [details]
/etc/gtk-2.0/i386-redhat-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf.loaders
Comment 12 Matthias Clasen 2004-10-14 19:10:46 UTC 
Created attachment 105226 [details]
/etc/gtk-2.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf.loaders
Comment 13 Alan Cox 2004-10-15 20:28:10 UTC 
Updated fixed it, not sure which bit in the end