Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 134959
FC3T2 openoffice file dialogs very broken on x86-64
Last modified: 2007-11-30 17:10:51 EST
There is no dependancies to suck in the Red Hat i386 theme.
If you then add these you get
Error loading XPM image loader: UNable to load image-loading module:
/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
mixed with a collection of
Glib and Gtk CRITICAL error spewage about G_IS_OBJECT(object) failed
and pixbuf != NULL.
Many icons on the buttons are missing
Also other stuff like CD-ROM and Floppy are missing from the selector.
If you hit CTRL-L you then discover ftp:// access is broken (but does
work in gnome applications).
Very very messy.
If it cannot load pixbuf loaders, it is no wonder that the icons are
Do you have /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/*.so, and are they
64bit shared objects ?
Do you have /etc/gtk-2.0/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf.loaders,
and does it look ok ?
I do and they work fine, but remember openoffice is a 32bit app so
should be using the 32bit loaders..
So the question is, why is 32-bit GTK looking for the loaders in the
Alan, do you have 32-bit redhat-artwork at all?
Depending on bug 135709 to get 32bit redhat-artwork installed.
The file dialog in ooo to work fine on a fresh x86_64 install of
Is your system a fresh install, or has it been updated from older test
releases, Alan ? The had some issues, initially, so maybe this is a
"rolling update" symptom...
Do you have /etc/gtk-2.0/i386-redhat-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf.loaders,
and does it list .so files in /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders ?
Are those present, and are 32-bit ?
I didnt originally have the 32bit ones installed but found that
updating them made no diferences. WHat else should be present( eg can
you email me an rpm -qa from a working case and I'll verify what the
problem item is)
Created attachment 105222 [details]
Created attachment 105223 [details]
rpm -ql gtk2 for the i386 package
Created attachment 105224 [details]
rpm -ql gtk2 for the x86_64 package
Created attachment 105225 [details]
Created attachment 105226 [details]
Updated fixed it, not sure which bit in the end