Bug 135379

Summary:	Confusing package name display
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Network	Reporter:	Jay Turner <jturner>
Component:	RHN/Web Site	Assignee:	J. Joseph Benavidez <jjb>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Max Spevack <mspevack>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	RHN Devel	CC:	rhn-bugs, srevivo
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-03-22 17:56:24 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	127673

Description Jay Turner 2004-10-12 12:19:28 UTC

Description of problem:
Check out the following page:

https://rhn.webdev.redhat.com/network/software/packages/details.pxt?pid=266693

Seems a little strange that we're displaying the package name with the
epoch embedded.  This is going to be very confusing to users, as 99%
of the userbase has not a clue what an epoch is, much less why we are
displaying a package name in that format.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Chip Turner 2004-10-15 01:57:57 UTC

fixed, now looks like a proper filename

Comment 2 Jay Turner 2004-10-15 08:09:36 UTC

Things look pretty good on webdev.  Not sure the correct state flow,
but throwing this in QA_READY, as that is supposed to mean "Ready for
next qa build" which seems to be exactly what this is.

Comment 3 Todd Warner 2004-10-21 16:44:31 UTC

QA push. {ON_DEV,QA_READY} --> ON_QA

Comment 4 Max Spevack 2004-11-30 18:38:32 UTC

Verified the fix.

Comment 5 Todd Warner 2005-03-22 17:56:24 UTC

Mass move from PROD_READY to CLOSED:CURRENTRELEASE