Bug 1358440

Summary: RFE install calamari on console machine instead of monitor machine
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Storage Console Reporter: Martin Bukatovic <mbukatov>
Component: coreAssignee: Nishanth Thomas <nthomas>
core sub component: provisioning QA Contact: sds-qe-bugs
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX Docs Contact:
Severity: medium    
Priority: unspecified CC: ltrilety
Version: 2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 3   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-23 04:06:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Martin Bukatovic 2016-07-20 17:15:11 UTC
Description of problem
======================

In the current design, RHSC 2.0 deploys calamari server on one of several
monitor machines. It would be more practical to deploy the calamari on the
machine which runs RHSC 2.0 itself instead.

Deploying calamari together with console would be easier to setup and
maintain from the admin point of view and would better align with ceph
cluster architecture.

Version-Release
===============

RHSC 2.0:

rhscon-ui-0.0.48-1.el7scon.noarch
rhscon-core-selinux-0.0.34-1.el7scon.noarch
rhscon-ceph-0.0.33-1.el7scon.x86_64
rhscon-core-0.0.34-1.el7scon.x86_64

ceph-selinux-10.2.2-22.el7cp.x86_64
libcephfs1-10.2.2-22.el7cp.x86_64
ceph-common-10.2.2-22.el7cp.x86_64
ceph-base-10.2.2-22.el7cp.x86_64
python-cephfs-10.2.2-22.el7cp.x86_64
ceph-mon-10.2.2-22.el7cp.x86_64

calamari-server-1.4.6-1.el7cp.x86_64