Bug 1358918 (qtwebbrowser)
Summary: | Review Request: qtwebbrowser - QtWebEngine based browser for embedded touch devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Raphael Groner <projects.rg> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, rdieter |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-12-07 22:24:24 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 928937 |
Description
Raphael Groner
2016-07-21 18:49:29 UTC
DEBUG util.py:421: No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(Qt5WebEngine)' … for epel7 and ppc64le (all Fedoras) Maybe add ExcludeArch? You should copy the ExclusiveArch line from qt5-qtwebengine. (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #2) > You should copy the ExclusiveArch line from qt5-qtwebengine. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298011#c7 . That may be a good long-term goal. But in the short-term, I'd recommend you follow Kevin's advice and copy the ExclusiveArch line from qt5-qtwebengine.spec I can help review this today... (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #1) > DEBUG util.py:421: No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(Qt5WebEngine)' > > … for epel7 and ppc64le (all Fedoras) > > Maybe add ExcludeArch? (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #2) > You should copy the ExclusiveArch line from qt5-qtwebengine. It's fixed for qt5-qtwebengine (see rhbz#1298011). I assume ExcludeArch is not needed any more for qtwebbrowser, too. sorry for the delay, I won't have time in the immediate future (removing myself as reviewer to allow someone else to take it for now) I'm confused. Is ExclusiveArch needed or not? There's now a patch for qtwebengine introducing a macro for ExclusiveArch (as I originally suggested). Yes, the macro simply makes using ExclusiveArch easier Lost interest in this package. Feel free to use this request as a base for another review. |