Bug 1358918 (qtwebbrowser) - Review Request: qtwebbrowser - QtWebEngine based browser for embedded touch devices
Summary: Review Request: qtwebbrowser - QtWebEngine based browser for embedded touch d...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: qtwebbrowser
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: qt-reviews
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-07-21 18:49 UTC by Raphael Groner
Modified: 2016-12-07 22:24 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-07 22:24:24 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1298011 0 low NEW qt5-qtwebengine is ExclusiveArch to the architectures supported by Chromium 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1298011

Description Raphael Groner 2016-07-21 18:49:29 UTC 
Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/qtwebbrowser/qtwebbrowser.spec
SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/qtwebbrowser/qtwebbrowser-1.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: QtWebEngine based browser for embedded touch devices
The Qt WebBrowser (codename Roadtrip) is a browser
for embedded devices developed using the capabilities
of Qt and Qt WebEngine. Using recent Chromium, it
features up-to-date HTML technologies behind a minimal
but slick touch-friendly user interface from Qt Quick.

Fedora Account System Username: raphgro

Test builds:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/raphgro/review/package/qtwebbrowser

Note: Upload to koji for scratch builds is slow from here, so I use copr.
Comment 1 Raphael Groner 2016-07-21 18:56:58 UTC 
DEBUG util.py:421:  No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(Qt5WebEngine)'

… for epel7 and ppc64le (all Fedoras)

Maybe add ExcludeArch?
Comment 2 Kevin Kofler 2016-07-21 23:10:40 UTC 
You should copy the ExclusiveArch line from qt5-qtwebengine.
Comment 3 Raphael Groner 2016-07-22 09:27:24 UTC 
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #2)
> You should copy the ExclusiveArch line from qt5-qtwebengine.

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298011#c7 .
Comment 4 Rex Dieter 2016-08-01 14:56:26 UTC 
That may be a good long-term goal.  But in the short-term, I'd recommend you follow Kevin's advice and copy the ExclusiveArch line from qt5-qtwebengine.spec
Comment 5 Rex Dieter 2016-08-16 14:09:09 UTC 
I can help review this today...
Comment 6 Raphael Groner 2016-10-21 15:05:16 UTC 
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #1)
> DEBUG util.py:421:  No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(Qt5WebEngine)'
> 
> … for epel7 and ppc64le (all Fedoras)
> 
> Maybe add ExcludeArch?

(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #2)
> You should copy the ExclusiveArch line from qt5-qtwebengine.

It's fixed for qt5-qtwebengine (see rhbz#1298011). I assume ExcludeArch is not needed any more for qtwebbrowser, too.
Comment 7 Raphael Groner 2016-10-21 15:07:02 UTC 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298011#c10
Comment 8 Rex Dieter 2016-10-21 15:19:36 UTC 
sorry for the delay, I won't have time in the immediate future (removing myself as reviewer to allow someone else to take it for now)
Comment 9 Raphael Groner 2016-10-29 13:45:24 UTC 
I'm confused. Is ExclusiveArch needed or not? There's now a patch for qtwebengine introducing a macro for ExclusiveArch (as I originally suggested).
Comment 10 Rex Dieter 2016-10-31 11:53:05 UTC 
Yes, the macro simply makes using ExclusiveArch easier
Comment 11 Raphael Groner 2016-12-07 22:24:24 UTC 
Lost interest in this package. Feel free to use this request as a base for another review.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.