Bug 1359667
Summary: | [Virtual Machines] [UI] - Can't import vm from export domain, engine report that there is no active export domain, although there is | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [oVirt] ovirt-engine | Reporter: | Michael Burman <mburman> | ||||||
Component: | BLL.Virt | Assignee: | Michal Skrivanek <michal.skrivanek> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | meital avital <mavital> | ||||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
Version: | 4.0.0 | CC: | amureini, bugs, gklein, mburman, mgoldboi, ylavi | ||||||
Target Milestone: | ovirt-4.0.2 | Flags: | gklein:
ovirt-4.0.z?
gklein: blocker? mgoldboi: planning_ack+ mburman: devel_ack? mburman: testing_ack? |
||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2016-07-28 07:58:58 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | Virt | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Michael Burman
2016-07-25 09:20:05 UTC
If we will switch the source to VMware for example and then back to Export Domain, we will see that the 'Load' button is no longer grayed out and we will be able to load and import the vm. duplicate of bug 1354495? No. The bug is that you don't have any active export domain although you have. Comment 1^^, is just a work around. Created attachment 1183738 [details]
screenshot1
Created attachment 1183740 [details]
screenshot2
sorry, i've meant a different bug - it is duplicate of bug 1340025 Since when this is a regression? (In reply to Michal Skrivanek from comment #6) > sorry, i've meant a different bug - it is duplicate of bug 1340025 > Since when this is a regression? I guess that yes, seems like it's the same. I don't know since when, but this is defiantly worked on previous versions. And btw, i see that this bug is appears to be on 3.6.8.1-0.1.el6 as well. (In reply to Michael Burman from comment #7) > (In reply to Michal Skrivanek from comment #6) > > sorry, i've meant a different bug - it is duplicate of bug 1340025 > > Since when this is a regression? > > I guess that yes, seems like it's the same. > I don't know since when, but this is defiantly worked on previous versions. > > And btw, i see that this bug is appears to be on 3.6.8.1-0.1.el6 as well. yes, and i reproduced it in 3.6.7 as well, hence I'm asking since when this is a regression, because it seems to me it's not. I suggest to drop the Regression kw and not block 4.0 I really don't know since when, i'm not testing this on daily basis, but it worked for sure on previous versions, so i guess it is a regression, but no idea since when. About blocking 4.0 maybe you are right, but it's not me to decide..) Yaniv, Gil ? - removing Regression as this is not a regression - moving to 4.0.4 due to a risk for 4.0.2, adjusting bug 1340025 accordingly *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1340025 *** |