Bug 1364725

Summary: Review Request: python-pytest-runner - Invoke py.test as distutils command with dependency resolution
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Vadim Rutkovsky <vrutkovs>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Gwyn Ciesla <gwync>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: jonathan.underwood, mcepl, mcepl, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: gwync: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-08-23 12:48:42 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1364736, 1366410    

Description Vadim Rutkovsky 2016-08-06 15:35:35 UTC
Spec URL: https://vrutkovs.fedorapeople.org/package_review/python-pytest-runner.spec
SRPM URL: https://vrutkovs.fedorapeople.org/package_review/python-pytest-runner-2.9-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Setup scripts can use pytest-runner to add setup.py test support for pytest runner.
Fedora Account System Username: vrutkovs

COPR build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vrutkovs/new-packages/build/438732/

Comment 1 Igor Gnatenko 2016-08-06 15:53:40 UTC
*** Bug 1341641 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Gwyn Ciesla 2016-08-08 14:21:10 UTC
Hello Vadim, I am a sponsor.  Have you done any practice reviews?

Comment 3 Vadim Rutkovsky 2016-08-11 14:57:26 UTC
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #2)
> Hello Vadim, I am a sponsor.  Have you done any practice reviews?

Hi,

Yes, I did several:

 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364777#c3
 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364620#c5

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2016-08-11 15:24:18 UTC
I had one addition, and you should be more verbose, especially with rpmlint warnings (they should be present, even the ignorable warnings, for reference), but they look mostly ok.  I'll review this.

Comment 5 Vadim Rutkovsky 2016-08-11 15:29:46 UTC
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #4)
> I had one addition, and you should be more verbose, especially with rpmlint
> warnings (they should be present, even the ignorable warnings, for
> reference), but they look mostly ok.

Oh, I see, I though those are for reviewer only so I removed those. Thanks!

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2016-08-11 15:37:11 UTC
- rpmlint checks return:

python-pytest-runner.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) py -> pt, p, y
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-pytest-runner.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) distutils -> distillates
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-pytest-runner.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US py -> pt, p, y
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

python-pytest-runner.src: E: description-line-too-long C Setup scripts can use pytest-runner to add setup.py test support for pytest runner.
Your description lines must not exceed 80 characters. If a line is exceeding
this number, cut it to fit in two lines.


- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license ( MIT ) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

Looks good, just needs the description shortened, which you can do prior to import.  What's your FAS username?

APPROVED

Comment 7 Gwyn Ciesla 2016-08-11 15:39:09 UTC
NM found it.

Comment 8 Gwyn Ciesla 2016-08-15 14:53:37 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pytest-runner

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2016-08-15 17:07:44 UTC
python-pytest-runner-2.9-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7fcf985c95

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2016-08-15 17:07:52 UTC
python-pytest-runner-2.9-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ab60aa64b1

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2016-08-15 18:26:24 UTC
python-pytest-runner-2.9-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ab60aa64b1

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2016-08-16 05:55:02 UTC
python-pytest-runner-2.9-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7fcf985c95

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2016-08-23 12:48:39 UTC
python-pytest-runner-2.9-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2016-08-27 10:31:05 UTC
python-pytest-runner-2.9-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 15 Jonathan Underwood 2016-09-12 21:30:05 UTC
Any chance of pushing this to F23 as well? I'd like to enable tests in the sshuttle package which requires pytest-runner in the buildroot

Comment 16 Igor Gnatenko 2016-09-13 06:18:36 UTC
(In reply to Jonathan Underwood from comment #15)
> Any chance of pushing this to F23 as well? I'd like to enable tests in the
> sshuttle package which requires pytest-runner in the buildroot

You can request branch in PkgDB.

But I would prefer to not do this, as you will have to change spec a bit and F23 will be EOL quite soon.