Bug 1366092

Summary: Subscriptions page should differentiate between not installed and insufficient privileges
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Wei Wang <weiwang>
Component: cockpitAssignee: Peter <pvolpe>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.3CC: bugs, cshao, fdeutsch, huiwa, huzhao, jscotka, leiwang, mpitt, rbarry, yaniwang, ycui
Target Milestone: pre-dev-freeze   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-01-23 12:32:51 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1329957, 1400961, 1447254, 1472751    
Attachments:
Description Flags
picture none

Description Wei Wang 2016-08-11 03:10:16 UTC
Created attachment 1189874 [details]
picture

Description of problem:
The user prompt is wrong in subscription page after login with non-root account.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHVH-7.2-20160804.0-RHVH-x86_64-dvd1.iso
imgbased-0.7.4-0.1.el7ev.noarch
cockpit-0.114-2.el7.x86_64
cockpit-ovirt-dashboard-0.10.6-1.3.4.el7ev.noarch


How reproducible:
100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RHVH-7.2-20160804.0-RHVH-x86_64-dvd1.iso (default ks file)
2. Login cockpit website hostIP:9090 with root account
3. Create an non-root account, then log out
4. Login with the non-root account
5. Select the "subscriptions" page, then checking the user prompt


Actual results:
The user prompt is wrong in subscription page after login with non-root account.


Expected results:
The user prompt should tell user the non-root account cannot use subscription functionality.



Additional info:
Subscription-manager is installed automatically after installing the RHVH.

Comment 2 Dominik Perpeet 2016-08-11 07:53:59 UTC
Good catch, this should be stated more clearly. I will look into the different cases.

Comment 4 Martin Pitt 2018-01-23 12:32:51 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1442540 ***