Bug 1372334

Summary: LibreOffice Calc running very slow on Fedora 23
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: fab <fab128>
Component: libreofficeAssignee: Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 23CC: caolanm, dtardon, erack, mstahl, sbergman
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-09-01 13:18:55 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description fab 2016-09-01 12:46:33 UTC
Description of problem:
LibreOffice Calc is running very slow on Fedora 23 with mate desktop and compiz. This bug is a regression since LibreOffice Calc was running fluently on Fedora 22 with the same hardware.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libreoffice-calc-5.0.6.2-9.fc23.x86_64

How reproducible:
Launch LibreOffice Calc and open a sheet with many cells and formulas. 
Try to navigate in the sheet with the scroll bars.
Try to type a new formula and see the result. 
Try to click and drag formulas and see the result.

Actual results:
Everything is very slow from the scrolling to the calculation of formulas. The click and drag may take up to 2 seconds before showing the value of the new cells.

Expected results:
LibreOffice Calcl show work fluently, just as it was on Fedora 22 with the same hardware.

Additional info:
mate-desktop-1.14.1-1.fc23.x86_64
compiz-manager-0.7.0-2.fc23.noarch
emerald-0.8.12.4-1.fc23.x86_64
kmod-nvidia-304xx (my GPU is a GeForce 9600 GT)

Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2016-09-01 12:55:03 UTC
Try the 5.0.6.2-10.fc23 update to see if this is bug 1303562 where CAIRO_OPERATOR_DIFFERENCE makes nvidia drivers ultra slow

Comment 2 fab 2016-09-01 13:18:55 UTC
This was it. Thanks a lot. I now mark my bug as duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1303562 ***