Bug 1379770

Summary: Storage chargeback unit is wrong
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Tsai Li Ming <ltsai>
Component: ReportingAssignee: Gregg Tanzillo <gtanzill>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Nandini Chandra <nachandr>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.6.0CC: clasohm, dajohnso, jhardy, jmarc, nachandr, obarenbo
Target Milestone: GA   
Target Release: 5.7.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: report:chargeback:storage
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-02 16:18:39 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: CFME Core Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
chargeback report
none
chargeback rate
none
rhosp container info none

Description Tsai Li Ming 2016-09-27 15:39:35 UTC 
Description of problem:
Storage calculation doesn't seem to correct. A daily chargeback using the default storage rate came up to $$1,030,792,151,040.00 for a 20GB storage volume.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
CF 4.1.1

How reproducible:
Don't know. 

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Enable C&U
2. Assign default rates to Enterprise
3. Provision VM
4. Create a daily chargeback report
5. Observe report

Actual results:
$1,030,792,151,040.00 storage cost! 

Expected results:
An accurate storage cost report

Additional info:
Comment 3 Tsai Li Ming 2016-09-27 15:43:35 UTC 
Created attachment 1205275 [details]
chargeback report
Comment 4 Tsai Li Ming 2016-09-27 15:43:59 UTC 
Created attachment 1205276 [details]
chargeback rate
Comment 5 Tsai Li Ming 2016-09-27 15:44:19 UTC 
Created attachment 1205277 [details]
rhosp container info
Comment 6 Dave Johnson 2016-09-29 23:04:15 UTC 
Nandini, is this a duplicate of bug 1379474 ?
Comment 7 Tsai Li Ming 2016-09-30 02:09:03 UTC 
Yup. Looks like the same issue.
Comment 8 Nandini Chandra 2016-11-02 16:18:39 UTC 
Closing this as a duplicate of bug 1379474

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1379474 ***