| Summary: | SDL_qsort.c license problem | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | mejiko <private> |
| Component: | SDL2 | Assignee: | Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | ignatenko, ppisar, tcallawa |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-10-05 14:44:09 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 182235 | ||
|
Description
mejiko
2016-10-05 09:44:22 UTC
If this bug exist - then it's in SDL(1). SDL2 and SDL package is included SDL_qsort.c, and license text is same. Why this bug "component" is SDL ? I think that SDL and SDL2 is different package. Thanks. finally got it. Next time please write better description. (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #3) > Next time please write better description. I understand, sorry. Upstream for qsort.c relicensed that code to zlib a while back, and SDL committed the change in trunk: https://hg.libsdl.org/SDL/rev/2e3396e62aa6 Permission for relicensing was retroactive, so applies to Fedora's copy of 2.0.4. |