Bug 1390027
| Summary: | Anaconda should tell the user it is running fsck, possibly allow to skip | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Charles R. Anderson <cra> |
| Component: | python-blivet | Assignee: | Blivet Maintenance Team <blivet-maint-list> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 25 | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, awilliam, blivet-maint-list, bugzilla, g.kaviyarasu, gmarr, jeder, jonathan, mkolman, robatino, vanmeeuwen+fedora, vponcova |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | RejectedBlocker RejectedFreezeException | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-11-07 18:46:10 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Charles R. Anderson
2016-10-30 23:08:32 UTC
In the end, the e2fsck took over 7.5 hours. There needs to be a way to skip this... Proposed as a Blocker for 25-final because I think it violates these criteria: Package and installer sources https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_Alpha_Release_Criteria#initialization-requirements Disk selection The user must be able to select which of the disks connected to the system will be affected by the installation process. Other disks not touched [show] References [show] (fsck is being performed on all partitions before disk selection is done) Also, while there is no specific criteria relating to how long it takes to perform an install, I think forcing users to wait 7.5 hours to fsck a filesystem before the install can proceed is worthy of discussion as to whether this should be a Blocker. See also bug #1162215 and bug #1170803. The latter bug points out in Comment 30: Eric Sandeen 2014-12-10 10:20:22 EST I've sent a patch upstream to drop the fsck requirement if we're only printing the minimum size. So it seems like the forced fsck should just be dropped from blivet now. This is in fact simply a dupe of #1170803 , which was never properly fixed. The e2fsprogs change that meant anaconda/blivet would no longer be required to run e2fsck prior to getting the minimum size was made. An update which applied that change was sent to F22 and marked as fixing #1170803 , pushed stable, and the bug was closed - but of course that alone did not actually fix the bug, because anaconda/blivet still had to be changed. And it never was. So this bug has remained all along. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1170803 *** Discussed during the 2016-11-07 blocker review meeting: [1] The decision to classify this bug as a RejectedBlocker and a RejectedFreezeException was made as this is an issue that has been around since Fedora 21 and has not blocked since. Though we note it causes e2fsck to perform 'safe' fixes on non-selected filesystems, as well as taking a long time if large ext2/3/4 filesystems are present, we don't see sufficient reason to change that decision or change this as an FE at this time. [1] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2016-11-07/f25-blocker-review.2016-11-07-17.01.txt |