Bug 1392239

Summary:	Pull latest qxl flickering fix when it lands upstream
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Cole Robinson <crobinso>
Component:	qemu	Assignee:	Fedora Virtualization Maintainers <virt-maint>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	amit.shah, berrange, cfergeau, dwmw2, itamar, kraxel, pbonzini, rjones, virt-maint
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-12-13 01:27:47 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Cole Robinson 2016-11-06 16:54:12 UTC

From https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266484#c83

(In reply to Christophe Fergeau from comment #83)
> (In reply to Cole Robinson from comment #74)
> > I'll do a qemu build tomorrow to pull in Christophe's qemu patch. I've filed
> > a separate bug to track pulling in the kernel fix:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385956
> 
> For the record, the QEMU patched is on its way upstream
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-11/msg00018.html
> It's a revised version of the patch which was attached to this bug/added to
> the package though
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/msg07483.html


So opening this bug to track the proper backport, when it lands upstream. Maybe we just wait until the next stable release if it's not urgent...

Comment 1 Cole Robinson 2016-12-05 00:26:49 UTC

Gerd, is this qxl patch likely to get into qemu 2.8?

https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/msg07483.html

Comment 2 Gerd Hoffmann 2016-12-05 08:46:01 UTC

(In reply to Cole Robinson from comment #1)
> Gerd, is this qxl patch likely to get into qemu 2.8?
> 
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/msg07483.html

Oops, that didn't went as planned.

Patch queued up, but didn't end up in a pull request.  Given that we are at blockers-only for 2.8 meanwhile I guess this means merging post-2.8 and cherry-picking into 2.8.1 ...

Comment 3 Cole Robinson 2016-12-05 14:02:12 UTC

(In reply to Gerd Hoffmann from comment #2)
> Patch queued up, but didn't end up in a pull request.  Given that we are at
> blockers-only for 2.8 meanwhile I guess this means merging post-2.8 and
> cherry-picking into 2.8.1 ...

Works for me, thanks

Comment 4 Gerd Hoffmann 2016-12-08 15:23:34 UTC

(In reply to Cole Robinson from comment #3)
> (In reply to Gerd Hoffmann from comment #2)
> > Patch queued up, but didn't end up in a pull request.  Given that we are at
> > blockers-only for 2.8 meanwhile I guess this means merging post-2.8 and
> > cherry-picking into 2.8.1 ...
> 
> Works for me, thanks

Tried a pull req nevertheless and stefan accepted it, so 2.8 comes with the fix.

Comment 5 Cole Robinson 2016-12-13 01:27:47 UTC

Okay, this was build for rawhide with -rc3, and incoming for F25, so just closing