From https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266484#c83 (In reply to Christophe Fergeau from comment #83) > (In reply to Cole Robinson from comment #74) > > I'll do a qemu build tomorrow to pull in Christophe's qemu patch. I've filed > > a separate bug to track pulling in the kernel fix: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385956 > > For the record, the QEMU patched is on its way upstream > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-11/msg00018.html > It's a revised version of the patch which was attached to this bug/added to > the package though > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/msg07483.html So opening this bug to track the proper backport, when it lands upstream. Maybe we just wait until the next stable release if it's not urgent...
Gerd, is this qxl patch likely to get into qemu 2.8? https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/msg07483.html
(In reply to Cole Robinson from comment #1) > Gerd, is this qxl patch likely to get into qemu 2.8? > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/msg07483.html Oops, that didn't went as planned. Patch queued up, but didn't end up in a pull request. Given that we are at blockers-only for 2.8 meanwhile I guess this means merging post-2.8 and cherry-picking into 2.8.1 ...
(In reply to Gerd Hoffmann from comment #2) > Patch queued up, but didn't end up in a pull request. Given that we are at > blockers-only for 2.8 meanwhile I guess this means merging post-2.8 and > cherry-picking into 2.8.1 ... Works for me, thanks
(In reply to Cole Robinson from comment #3) > (In reply to Gerd Hoffmann from comment #2) > > Patch queued up, but didn't end up in a pull request. Given that we are at > > blockers-only for 2.8 meanwhile I guess this means merging post-2.8 and > > cherry-picking into 2.8.1 ... > > Works for me, thanks Tried a pull req nevertheless and stefan accepted it, so 2.8 comes with the fix.
Okay, this was build for rawhide with -rc3, and incoming for F25, so just closing