Bug 1400064

Summary:	[RFE] Allow configuring the OpenShift proxy per provider in the UI
Product:	Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine	Reporter:	Prasad Mukhedkar <pmukhedk>
Component:	UI - OPS	Assignee:	Erez Freiberger <efreiber>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Einat Pacifici <epacific>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.7.0	CC:	bazulay, dajohnso, efreiber, epacific, fsimonce, hkataria, jhardy, mpovolny, obarenbo, simaishi
Target Milestone:	MVP	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	5.9.0	Flags:	epacific: automate_bug+
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	container:ui
Fixed In Version:	5.9.0.4	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-03-01 13:08:18 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	Container Management	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Prasad Mukhedkar 2016-11-30 11:52:48 UTC

In cfme 5.7, We added CustomAttributesMixin to ContainerProvider.
The custom attributes allows us to set various environment variables
like NO_PROXY,  HTTP_PROXY adn HTTPS_PROXY. 

This rfe introduced the feature, 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365369

This rfe added the backend support, frontend support to input the 
values is still not implemented. Currently we have to input them
through rails console : 

for example with `a` being your provider (`a = ExtManagementSystem.find_
by_name('<NAME FOR YOUR PROVIDER>')`   ) you can add `no_proxy`, `http_proxy`
and `https_proxy` with this command:

This rfe is to get ui support for setting custom attributes of container
provider through the UI. Advance Setting?

Comment 3 Federico Simoncelli 2016-12-15 16:17:38 UTC

Note: we don't want to let the user being able to set any custom attribute at his will but just the ones related to the proxy.

(Title edited).

Comment 4 Federico Simoncelli 2017-07-12 07:53:53 UTC

Erez can you add the relevant PRs here?
Please move to ON_DEV if you have all the PRs up for review.

Comment 5 Erez Freiberger 2017-07-12 07:58:25 UTC

This is not implemented yet, and more PRs will be needed, currently:

The main PR in the UI, still WIP:
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/1652

It depends on:
ManageIQ/manageiq#15398
ManageIQ/manageiq-schema#23
ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-kubernetes#45
ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-openshift#32

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2018-03-01 13:08:18 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0380