Bug 1400064 - [RFE] Allow configuring the OpenShift proxy per provider in the UI
Summary: [RFE] Allow configuring the OpenShift proxy per provider in the UI
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: UI - OPS
Version: 5.7.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: MVP
: 5.9.0
Assignee: Erez Freiberger
QA Contact: Einat Pacifici
URL:
Whiteboard: container:ui
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-30 11:52 UTC by Prasad Mukhedkar
Modified: 2018-04-17 08:24 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.9.0.4
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-01 13:08:18 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: Container Management
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
epacific: automate_bug+


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2018:0380 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: Red Hat CloudForms security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2018-03-01 18:37:12 UTC

Description Prasad Mukhedkar 2016-11-30 11:52:48 UTC
In cfme 5.7, We added CustomAttributesMixin to ContainerProvider.
The custom attributes allows us to set various environment variables
like NO_PROXY,  HTTP_PROXY adn HTTPS_PROXY. 

This rfe introduced the feature, 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365369

This rfe added the backend support, frontend support to input the 
values is still not implemented. Currently we have to input them
through rails console : 

for example with `a` being your provider (`a = ExtManagementSystem.find_
by_name('<NAME FOR YOUR PROVIDER>')`   ) you can add `no_proxy`, `http_proxy`
and `https_proxy` with this command:

This rfe is to get ui support for setting custom attributes of container
provider through the UI. Advance Setting?

Comment 3 Federico Simoncelli 2016-12-15 16:17:38 UTC
Note: we don't want to let the user being able to set any custom attribute at his will but just the ones related to the proxy.

(Title edited).

Comment 4 Federico Simoncelli 2017-07-12 07:53:53 UTC
Erez can you add the relevant PRs here?
Please move to ON_DEV if you have all the PRs up for review.

Comment 5 Erez Freiberger 2017-07-12 07:58:25 UTC
This is not implemented yet, and more PRs will be needed, currently:

The main PR in the UI, still WIP:
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/1652

It depends on:
ManageIQ/manageiq#15398
ManageIQ/manageiq-schema#23
ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-kubernetes#45
ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-openshift#32

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2018-03-01 13:08:18 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0380


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.