Bug 140168
Summary: | Please add gpgme 1.0.x to the distribution | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Toshio Kuratomi <toshio> |
Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-11-22 04:47:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Toshio Kuratomi
2004-11-20 15:04:43 UTC
Currently, there are two apps that have gpgme support, and they both require different versions. Until there's something that actually uses it, I doubt it will be in Core - Extras is a better place. Sure thing. What're the two apps (Sylpheed and Balsa?) I'll spend some time seeing if I can push some patches upstream to get them running with the stable gpgme. Then I'll revisit with two apps that use it :-) sylpheed, balsa, and kmail, I think. Balsa tested - it seems to compile and run with gpgme 1.0.1. I can submit my patch to the spec if this is to go in. kmail untested - grepping the sources and reading ChangeLog and configure.in indicated kmail should be compatible with gpgme-1.0.1 but trying to build it swapped my machine to death. I guess I just don't have the RAM to compile kdepim. Rex Dieter has been building kmail with gpgme-0.4.x, though. I can ask him if gpgme-1.0.1 worked out of the box as well or if there was anything that he had to do if it makes any difference. sylpheed - This needs work to get running with 1.0.1 as it has been built to work with 0.3 instead of 0.4. I'll get working on this but don't know when it'll get in upstream as sylpheed is concentrating on a 1.0 release right now. My explorations also show that Rex is building the Fedora.us packages with support for gpgsm (S/Mime) which requires having (at least parts of) gnupg2. For what I want (API for access to GPG keyrings, signing, and verification) I disabled this in my private gpgme build. If gpgme is included, RH would have to decide how they want to deal with this. (Note: The gpgme 1.0.x API is mostly an extension of 0.4.x The 0.3->0.4 transition is where most breakage occurred.) |