Bug 1406249

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1406025 +++

Description of problem:

When the node is deleted from existing ganesha cluster,volume entry of the exported volume gets deleted from /etc/ganesha/ganesha.conf file.
As a result the existing node reflects the stale entry of the volume in showmount -e localhost

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# rpm -qa | grep ganesha
nfs-ganesha-2.4.1-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
nfs-ganesha-gluster-2.4.1-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-ganesha-3.8.4-9.el7rhgs.x86_64


How reproducible:
Consistently

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Create 6 node ganesha cluster on 8 node gluster.Enable ganesha on it
2.Delete 1 node from existing ganesha cluster 
/usr/libexec/ganesha/ganesha-ha.sh --delete /var/run/gluster/shared_storage/nfs-ganesha/ dhcp46-232.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com
3.Check /etc/ganesha/ganesha.conf file.


Actual results:
Check /etc/ganesha/ganesha.conf file.Volume which was previously exported gets deleted from this file.

showmount -e localhost reflects stale entry of previously exported volume
In this case if the node is deleted and again added,previously exported volume (before node delete) is not exported on the node which is added.

Expected results:
It should not modify the /etc/ganesha/ganesha.conf file.
Volume should be exported on the newly added node

Additional info:


--- Additional comment from Soumya Koduri on 2016-12-19 11:54:27 EST ---



create_ganesha_conf_file()                                                          
{       
        if [ $1 == "yes" ];                                                         
        then    
                if [  -e $GANESHA_CONF ];                                           
                then    
                        rm -rf $GANESHA_CONF                                        
                fi
        # The symlink /etc/ganesha/ganesha.conf need to be                          
        # created using ganesha conf file mentioned in the                          
        # shared storage. Every node will only have this
        # link and actual file will stored in shared storage,                       
        # so that ganesha conf editing of ganesha conf will                         
        # be easy as well as it become more consistent.                             
                
                ln -s $HA_CONFDIR/ganesha.conf $GANESHA_CONF                        
        else
        # Restoring previous file
                rm -rf $GANESHA_CONF
                sed -r -i -e '/^%include[[:space:]]+".+\.conf"$/d' $HA_CONFDIR/ganesha.conf


^^^^ This line (which could have removed $VOL.conf in ganesha.conf file) is not necessary IMO. Jiffin would be best to comment

--- Additional comment from Jiffin on 2016-12-19 13:16:25 EST ---

(In reply to Soumya Koduri from comment #2)
> 
> create_ganesha_conf_file()                                                  
> 
> {       
>         if [ $1 == "yes" ];                                                 
> 
>         then    
>                 if [  -e $GANESHA_CONF ];                                   
> 
>                 then    
>                         rm -rf $GANESHA_CONF                                
> 
>                 fi
>         # The symlink /etc/ganesha/ganesha.conf need to be                  
> 
>         # created using ganesha conf file mentioned in the                  
> 
>         # shared storage. Every node will only have this
>         # link and actual file will stored in shared storage,               
> 
>         # so that ganesha conf editing of ganesha conf will                 
> 
>         # be easy as well as it become more consistent.                     
> 
>                 
>                 ln -s $HA_CONFDIR/ganesha.conf $GANESHA_CONF                
> 
>         else
>         # Restoring previous file
>                 rm -rf $GANESHA_CONF
>                 sed -r -i -e '/^%include[[:space:]]+".+\.conf"$/d'
> $HA_CONFDIR/ganesha.conf
> 
> 
> ^^^^ This line (which could have removed $VOL.conf in ganesha.conf file) is
> not necessary IMO. Jiffin would be best to comment
Yes above mentioned is absolutely correct. Based on that I have given workaround in Manisha's setup. But didn't work out as expected. Tomorrow I will check again