Bug 1413382
| Summary: | request for ostree 2016.15 in epel7 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Ben Konrath <ben> |
| Component: | ostree | Assignee: | Colin Walters <walters> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel7 | CC: | jlebon, lucab, walters |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-09-15 15:49:15 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1415948 | ||
|
Description
Ben Konrath
2017-01-15 15:25:43 UTC
One potential stumbling block here is that ostree is also consumed by the Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host variant. And it's possible for people to enable EPEL both for the host and in containers - and if EPEL has a higher version, at least in the using-yum-container case we may get silent upgrades. That said...I'm OK with this. We might as well do rpm-ostree too, and that would potentially give us a nicer delivery path than what we've been doing so far in the CentOS SIGs. EPEL at least currently has better visibility. Just wondering if there has been any progress on this? |