Bug 1415358
| Summary: | systemd-udevd and journald fail to start on i686 (systemd 232) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adam Williamson <awilliam> |
| Component: | systemd | Assignee: | systemd-maint |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | johannbg, john.ellson, lfelia, lnykryn, msekleta, muadda, ssahani, s, systemd-maint, zbyszek |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | systemd-232-11.fc26 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-01-30 14:35:07 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Adam Williamson
2017-01-21 01:42:14 UTC
Looks like this is: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/4575 via Arch (thanks, Arch): https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/51693 And this should fix it: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/469830d1426a91e0897c321fdc8ee428f0a750c1 I'll throw that at the Rawhide package and see how it goes. Unfortunately that patch doesn't backport cleanly to v232, and the adjustments necessary aren't trivial, there are cases where the patch touches code that was changed substantially in other ways between v232 and the patch's changes, so I'm not really comfortable with adapting the backport. I'll leave this to the systemd maintainers to decide what the best approach is, but please, it would be nice to have this fixed ASAP. Even though i686 is not a 'primary arch' any more, breaking it entirely is not great. The patches are in rawhide with systemd-232-11.fc26, please test. *** Bug 1416198 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Yes this boots as expected. Thank you. |