Bug 1419497
| Summary: | Allow disabling registry.access.redhat.com | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Marko Myllynen <myllynen> |
| Component: | Installer | Assignee: | Scott Dodson <sdodson> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Johnny Liu <jialiu> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 3.4.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, dsundqvi, jokerman, mmccomas, myllynen |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-05-21 18:49:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Marko Myllynen
2017-02-06 10:56:23 UTC
What's the impact of this in an environment where access to registry.access.redhat.com is blocked? Setting to low severity as I believe this won't actually break anything. Correct, low prio, zero impact if you have "127.0.0.2 registry.access.redhat.com" in your /etc/hosts or firewall configured but those are needless extra steps compared to registry.access.redhat.com not being enabled at all. Thanks. If having registry.access.redhat.com forced into the docker config actually creates problems without putting in a garbage /etc/hosts entry in we should consider this a medium. If it's just cosmetic we'll leave it at low. Can be achieved by setting openshift_docker_ent_reg='' in 3.9 and later. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1461465 *** |