Bug 1420887

Summary: Cross protocol data access table needs to be corrected for Object access
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Alok <asrivast>
Component: doc-Administration_GuideAssignee: Anjana Suparna Sriram <asriram>
doc-Administration_Guide sub component: 3.1 Release QA Contact: storage-qa-internal <storage-qa-internal>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE Docs Contact:
Severity: high    
Priority: unspecified CC: asriram, asrivast, rcyriac, rhinduja, rhs-bugs, sabose, sbhaloth, storage-doc
Version: rhgs-3.1Keywords: ZStream
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: RHGS 3.1.3 Async   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-13 12:03:37 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Alok 2017-02-09 18:42:53 UTC
Table 7.1 mentions that concurrent access with Object and gNFS/FUSE is not supported.
This is incorrect information as the "Unified file and object" support of RHGS does the same. This needs to be corrected in any async update of 3.1.3 documentation.

Comment 2 Sahina Bose 2017-02-10 07:02:16 UTC
Alok, it looks like the document was updated to be this way based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393653#c31

Has the QE stance on this changed to include object+fuse concurrent access support?

Comment 4 surabhi 2017-02-23 10:57:41 UTC
As per comments in BZ#1393653 the FUSe+Object access is tested for all basic operations and automation sanity also covers it. But there may still be unknowns which are not tested extensively w.r.t concurrent access. 

Since the concurrent access works(not extensively tested) I am ok to add it to the supportability matrix.

Comment 8 Rahul Hinduja 2017-03-08 06:53:56 UTC
Changes looks good to me. Moving this bug to verified state.