Bug 1424425

Summary: scratch: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fedora Release Engineering <releng>
Component: scratchAssignee: Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: mattdm, msuchy
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-02-20 12:10:16 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1423041    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 17:04:55 UTC 
Your package scratch failed to build from source in current rawhide.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17791352

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 17:04:59 UTC 
Created attachment 1254546 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 17:05:03 UTC 
Created attachment 1254547 [details]
root.log
Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 17:05:05 UTC 
Created attachment 1254548 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Matthew Miller 2017-02-19 20:32:52 UTC 
I am really unlikely to fix this. Scratch has never been 64-bit clean, which makes it problematic on Fedora to begin with. This codebase is old and hard to maintain — and the preferred form for modification is a Squeak VM image, not source code in the normal sense.

I'm optimistic that someday we'll have an HTML5-based Scratch 2.0 (or 3.0), but in the meantime, I think this is a dead end.
Comment 5 Miroslav Suchý 2017-02-20 11:43:24 UTC 
This is just use of macro in spec. That macro does not exist any more. It is easy to fix. I will do that.
Comment 6 Miroslav Suchý 2017-02-20 12:10:16 UTC 
it was just missing systemd as BR. Package has been rebuilt
Comment 7 Matthew Miller 2017-03-07 21:36:25 UTC 
Okay, thanks Miroslav. It's better to have it working than not, for sure. :)