Bug 1424425 - scratch: FTBFS in rawhide
Summary: scratch: FTBFS in rawhide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: scratch
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Miroslav Suchý
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F26FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-02-17 17:04 UTC by Fedora Release Engineering
Modified: 2017-03-07 21:36 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-02-20 12:10:16 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (18.68 KB, text/plain)
2017-02-17 17:04 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
root.log (72.50 KB, text/plain)
2017-02-17 17:05 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
state.log (631 bytes, text/plain)
2017-02-17 17:05 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
View All

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 17:04:55 UTC 
Your package scratch failed to build from source in current rawhide.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17791352

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 17:04:59 UTC 
Created attachment 1254546 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 17:05:03 UTC 
Created attachment 1254547 [details]
root.log
Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 17:05:05 UTC 
Created attachment 1254548 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Matthew Miller 2017-02-19 20:32:52 UTC 
I am really unlikely to fix this. Scratch has never been 64-bit clean, which makes it problematic on Fedora to begin with. This codebase is old and hard to maintain — and the preferred form for modification is a Squeak VM image, not source code in the normal sense.

I'm optimistic that someday we'll have an HTML5-based Scratch 2.0 (or 3.0), but in the meantime, I think this is a dead end.
Comment 5 Miroslav Suchý 2017-02-20 11:43:24 UTC 
This is just use of macro in spec. That macro does not exist any more. It is easy to fix. I will do that.
Comment 6 Miroslav Suchý 2017-02-20 12:10:16 UTC 
it was just missing systemd as BR. Package has been rebuilt
Comment 7 Matthew Miller 2017-03-07 21:36:25 UTC 
Okay, thanks Miroslav. It's better to have it working than not, for sure. :)
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.